Decentralized trials: The cough conundrum

As the healthcare industry continues to embrace remote trial methods, the need for reliable cough monitoring solutions becomes increasingly apparent, says Dr Peter Small, of Hyfe AI. OSP put forward a number of questions to him to delve into the complexities surrounding cough monitoring and explore the potential implications for clinical research and patient care.

He believes we’re in a perfect storm of wearable sensors, powerful AI models, reliable monitoring platforms and digital therapeutics, which can change the process and enhance the accuracy of monitoring, ultimately leading to new treatments and a radical change in respiratory care. OSP: Why has the widespread use of cough counting tools, to date, been limited by a reliance on human input to determine cough frequency?​

PS:​ It’s not been for a lack of effort. Folks have been trying to automatically monitor coughs for over 25 years. The initial efforts were based on a variety of sensors such as stretch receptors on vests or EMG recordings from straps. A couple of decades ago a major advance came from using contact and ambient microphones linked to a belt with a sound recorder and data compression algorithms. It was only by having people listen to these recordings that coughing could be quantified.

A variety of rules-based approaches were attempted for identifying cough sounds from such recordings, but the performance of these approaches was limited and insufficient for use in clinical trials. The game changer has been the application of acoustic AI to massive cough databases to create cough recognition algorithms. With sufficient quantities of well annotated diverse data to train on these algorithms can automatically recognize cough from other explosive sounds in near real time with amazing accuracy. These algorithms can be rapidly scaled given the ubiquity of high-quality microphones and chips sets in smart devices.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *