use of elC may surpass use of paper consent forms

Medable partnered with Duke University Department of Population Health Sciences Bioethics and stakeholder (BASE) lab for the pilot study that compared participant comprehension and usability, satisfaction, and preference of enhanced elC versus text-only elC. It specifically explored the use of interactive videos, graphics, calendars, and other tools to augment text in an elC form.

The study looked at 24 patients who reviewed an eIC in a mock study for an investigative medicine to treat hypertension. Half reviewed the text-only eIC first followed by the enhanced eIC, and the other half did the opposite.

The study population was diverse in gender, age, race, and geographic location. Nearly three-fourths (71%) of the study participants said the enhanced eIC was more informative and indicated that the digital elements were personable and made them feel more informed, engaged, comfortable, and prepared to participate in clinical research.

“The enhanced eIC is more appealing to me as a human being, not just a study subject,” said a 63-year-old male participant.

“It made me feel more comfortable and showed that people were really thinking about what needed to be done to make this more understandable to a layperson. Taking the time to put those extra digital explainers in the consent form gave me a personal feeling attached whereas the other format was dry and cold…just a piece of paper.”

Surpassing paper consent forms

The use of elC may surpass the use of paper consent forms as decentralized approaches and technology become more and more common in clinical trials.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *